Friday, February 5, 2010

Lowe Vs. Burke, Revisited

Almost three years ago, Kevin Lowe did Brian Burke a favour and signed away Dustin Penner. This act triggered an increasingly embarrassing and very public comparison of cock sizes between the two. It was embarrassing not only because of the inherent immaturity of it all, but also because they weren't so much claiming, "My cock is bigger than yours" but, rather, "Your cock is smaller than mine." Well, that's great and all, but of course the debate is just as valid if theirs also happened to be the two smallest cocks on the playground. (Gary Bettman, of course, holds the title of "Biggest Cock.")


Now where was I again? Oh, right, I was talking about cocks.

Burke claimed that Lowe ran the Oilers into the sewer, and that he was a GM desperate to keep his job. That's hard to debate considering their free-fall following a surprising run to game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals. One quibble with Burke's assessment is that Lowe did not need to be concerned with keeping his job, as evidenced by his promotion from GM to President of Hockey Operations. Neither the previous owners or Rexall mogul Daryl Katz seem interested in holding the team's executive brass to account. Lowe's job is secure because, in the Oilers' NHL era, he was their first ever draft pick, scored their first ever goal, won 5 Stanley Cups with them, and has played more games as an Oiler than anyone else. His lofty position has nothing to do with merit or performance in his current role and has everything to do with being one of the Boys on the Bus.


Eventually, Lowe had had enough of Burke's comments to the media and responded with some venom of his own. Lowe called Burke a moron and a media junkie, dismissed the Anaheim hockey market as pathetic, called Bobby Ryan a waste of a draft pick, and argued Burke's M.O. is to deplete a team of its assets before moving on to greener pastures. Phew, I forgot just how dense Lowe's rant was. Too bad he was working with less ammunition than Burke had on him. Looked at today, most of what he bitched about rings false. First, Burke's not a moron -- the dude's got a doctorate in law, after all -- though he certainly is a media junkie. Second, cutting down the Anaheim hockey market was a cheapshot that had nothing to do with anything. Third, Bobby Ryan has more goals this year than any Oiler, just like he did last year when he was a rookie. Some waste. Fourth, Burke left the Canucks with the Sedin sisters, Kevin Bieksa, Ryan Kesler, and Alexandre Burrows, all of whom came into the organization during his tenure. And he left Anaheim with a Stanley Cup banner in the rafters. So, out of all that nonsense, the only zing Lowe connected with is that he's a media junkie. It would seem that Brian Burke's cock is in fact bigger. Or, more appropriately that Kevin Lowe's is smaller.


But, hold on, maybe Burke being a media junkie should be considered more of a significant negative characteristic. Burke has left the relative anonymity of operating in California and is now working out of the focal point of the hockey media. Burke can't take a shit anymore without a live TSN panel praising its fragrant complexities. But, like Lowe said, Burke craves this kind of exposure. And it seems to me it's affecting his business decisions.

One of Burke's first significant transactions as the Leafs' GM was trading two first-round and one second-round draft picks to Boston for a then-injured Phil Kessel, rather than pulling a Penner and signing him away as a restriced free agent. This trade was fucking stupid. Burke said it was a move to push the Maple Leafs into the playoffs, for anything less would be unacceptable. That is the same misguided, impatient management philosophy that has made the Maple Leafs the joke that they are (though at least Burke has updated the strategy to targeting young players rather than guys nearing retirement). And, despite all Burke's bluster, I don't believe for a second that he thought that team could make the playoffs. (And his commitment seems even more artificial now that he's traded away four of the Leaf's top-eight scorers, though he's still been sticking to that same playoffs song and dance for the press gallery.) Kessel's a good goal scorer, but he's not the kind of player who can carry a franchise on his back. That trade was nothing more than Burke sacrificing the team's long-term future to make an immediate splash. A photo opportunity with a second-tier star that will cost the Leafs two very high draft picks.


Meanwhile, in Edmonton, there's a new guy making questionable decisions. Steve Tambellini inherited Lowe's clusterfuck of a gong show of a mess (but not before Lowe gave him the a final gift of signing Shawn Horcoff to one of the most crippling contracts in the league). Steve's three major accomplishments with the Oilers to date have been: 1) signing Khabibulin, which is the equivalent of putting a four million dollar bandage on lung cancer, 2) wasting months in a failed attempt to woo Dany Heatley, and 3) hiring Pat Quinn to chew gum and look confused. But, really, I don't fault Steve. I feel kind of sorry for him. No GM could fix the deep and systemic damages that Lowe has done, at least not until some of the long-term contracts he signed are off the books.

The Oilers' cupboards are bare right now but, as a fan (why the fuck am I still a fan?... there's a topic for a future blog), at least I can take solace in that ineptitude in sports is rewarded on draft day. Lowe's bad decisions will be converted into a great prospect this June. There's a faint glimmer of light on the horizon. Or at least there is in Edmonton. Toronto's just fucked.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

When (if I can stand it) I watch the Oilers, I cheer for the other team. I want them to come in dead last, and get the number 1 draft pick. Then I want them to clean house (which apparently the might do after the Olympics) and start with something new. The only people I don't want sent on their way are the guys that clean their shit filled equipment and the janitors that clean their shit filled dressing rooms. By now, those guys have to be guys have got to be great at what they do.

I want them to come back next year and be like the movie Major League - but only in hockey. They need a star player to be "Wild Thing" Vaughn and a smoking hot new ownwer.

Anonymous said...

I love the Barefoot rants, but I don't know if I agree with your thoughts on the Leafs. Not to mention the terrible timing of such comments given the Burke family loss. They traded away assets that did not help them win and got an impact player in return (Phaneuf). I think the players they can call up from the minors, as well as waiver wire pickups, can do close to if not a better job than the players they traded away. The only slightly questionable move is trading away two picks for Kessel. But if you could trade one pick for a young player who was an early draft pick himself and has just enough experience to let you know he was a good pick and has what it takes to be a star in this league, you'd be a fool not to do it. And given there is no guarantee one of those draft picks will be as good as Kessel, I think trading two unknowns for one proven commodity is a good move. Yes they could both be better, not likely much better, but they could also be worse, and possibly much worse as in never making the league. The risk/reward on this deal means he did the right thing in pulling the trigger on it.

About the Oilers. I hate watching them on TV. The lottery should not be weighted so the last place team has the best chance to pick first. It should be a completely even opportunity for the lottery picks, because I hate seeing a team and thinking they are trying to lose. Even if it's not true, and they are not throwing games, they should not be rewarded in any way for this pathetic season.

Ryan N. said...

Ricky, two rebuttals.

Phaneuf: I'm not convinced that he is much of an impact player, partly because his current liabilities (his $6.5 million salary hit, his attitude, his shitty positioning) outweigh the benefits (big hits, good skater, and a hard shot). He often gets compared to Scott Stevens. That's horseshit. He's much more comparable to Jovanovski, or even Kasparitis, which, frankly, isn't all that superb, and nothing to form a team around. Still, I don't mind that trade because it builds towards the future without mortgaging it. My problem with the trade was Burke's comments that this was a move towards making the playoffs this season. Either Burke is lying (which would be fine if he wasn't such a blowhard when it comes to having integrity), or he's doing a piss-poor job of achieving his goals, or he has set the wrong goals for his team. Probably a mix of the three, really.

Kessel: First round draft picks ("and, given [Toronto]'s recent performance, I expect them to be excellent picks") are more valuable than you're giving credit. Toronto will be drafting in the top three this year. Look at the previous decades worth of top 3 picks:

2009: Tavares, Hedman, Duchene
2008: Stamkos, Doughty, Bogosian
2007: Kane, Van Riemsdyk, Turris
2006: Erik Johnson, Jordan Staal, Toews
2005: Crosby, Ryan, Jack Johnson
2004: Ovechkin, Malkin, Barker
2003: Fleury, Staal, Horton
2002: Nash, Lehtonen, Bouwmeester
2001: Kovalchuk, Spezza, Svitov
2000: DiPietro, Heatley, Gaborik

Almost all of these guys are key NHLers, and I would only take Kessel over 7 or 8 of them. So, unless guys like Taylor Hall or Tyler Seguin (who are both kicking some ass in the OHL this year) have been overhyped to a degree not seen since Alexandre Daigle, a top pick this year will become another top player in a short amount of time. And scouting is so much better now than in the 90s that busts like Stefan, Daigle, Bonsignore, or Svitov are becoming more and more a rare occurrence.

And then there's the other first rounder they gave up. Even if Toronto improves all the way from terrible to mediocre, a mid-to-late first rounder in 2011 could always end up being a guy like a Semin or a Kopitar, a Parise or a Getzlaf, a Mike Green or a Corey Perry, an Iginla or a Hemsky, a Jeff Carter or a Mike Richards, all of whom were taken in the first round after the 10th selection. Of course it's against the odds that they'll get a player of that calibre, but it's possible. More likely, a later first round pick will develop into a depth player. (Of course, all this talk about later first round picks is moot because Toronto is still going to suck next year and therefore missing out on another top 5 pick.)

So, really, what does trading for Kessel really gain the Leafs? They're losing out on an opportunity to draft a top pick who, history suggests, will be a player at least as talented as Kessel (and handing that opportunity to a team within their own division, I might add) PLUS a first rounder and a second rounder. All they gained were twenty to thirty more goals this season and next season than they otherwise would have had (disregarding any free agent they could have paid his $5.4 million to who could score those goals without giving up the picks). So instead of being the worst team in the league, Kessel has earned them the bragging rights of being only the SECOND worst team in the league. If that's the extent of the reward, and I think it is, give me the risk (which I think is a safe gamble).

All in all, I stand firm regarding the Leafs questionable deals this year. Still, they were better moves than anything the Oilers have done since 2006!

(I agree that the current lottery system doesn't work and that all non-playoff teams should have equal odds for draft positioning. I also agree that the timing of my post was unfortunate, but it is pretty hard to know about a stranger's fatal car accident BEFORE it happens.)